I think I'll be conscious of all my weirdisms for the foreseeable future, given the string of tags that TLC started a couple weeks ago.
I won't keep numbering them, because frankly that will just get embarrassing for me.
So, it just occurred to me that although I like the concept of tagging my blog posts, I can't bring myself to do it. This is because I don't like the "general" category. Or any category otherwise named that serves the same "everything that's not covered by my other pre-defined categories" purpose. If the blog were done, or involved a finite set of data or type of data, I could bring myself to categorize it. But since I feel like I would be endlessly re-shuffling categories and adding new ones, I can't be bothered.
For all this, I blame my good friend Mark Palmer. Mark taught me the concept of MECE. When making lists (such as lists of categories of blog posts), he aims to make the categories Mutually Exclusive and Collectively Exhaustive. I love this. It appeals to my 'rule following' self and the "J" part of my personality. I can imagine some people may not make the immediate jump to why this brings me angst with regard to creating categories for my blog.
Following MECE principles, the categories should also be specific - the "general' category is a total cop-out. It's not really a category at all. So if I were to categorize my blog, I would ALSO have to add potential recategorization of all posts every time I write something new.
Somehow, total anarchy with regard to the organization of my posts seems less stressful to even my longs-for-order self.
It still saddens me a little bit, though...because I think people who categorize their blog entries are better bloggers than I am. And I like being really good at stuff...so I'm a little disappointed in myself, but at least comfortable with why I won't be altering that little piece of my life anytime soon.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
12 comments:
Dovie, that post, Generally speaking, is in itself like 6 weirdisms all rolled up into one. As one who tags his posts because the default is either general or uncategorized, I would put this post in a new category altogether: Quirkinessesisms Pre-Re-restated.
And I agree: Palmer's rules are collectively exhausting.
Oh, Dennis...you're SO PUNNY!
Can one blog entry have multiple tags/categories?
oddly enough, I didn't use even one pun in that last comment. Maybe I was just Pre-kidding, which is a word (prekid) I just invented that would mean to set someone up for a later joke. That would of course mean that later, upon telling the story of the joke in your presence, you could say: "For the Love! Are you re-kidding me?"
You are all sick and need language therapy.
GOOD ON YOU GIRL! ;) Down with tagging!
MP, I have noticed some people use multiple tags for a single entry, but somehow I don't like that (for me)...
I am a fan of the multiple tagging.
I do get the issue, though. I have far too many email folders in my work email. I have some folders that just have one email in them, and this doesn't seem very efficient. I need organization therapy.
I like multiple tags because some posts just need them to be applied like having more than one name helps people differentiate one Jonathan Edwards from another Jonathan Edwards (links would really be helpful here). But really it is all irrelevant if nobody ever searches the blog categorically anyway. And if one were to search a blog by categories, who would actually look at the "General" category? Other than Hon, of course...
I guess I'm not opposed to multiple tags...but it just seems less "clean" to me. I do realize that's ridiculous.
What is wierd? If you're functional, then anything you do that makes you unique is why you're you ... I'd be proud of it, not to mention the fact that embracing those things is awesome.
But what do I know, I'm pretty wierd myself.
Post a Comment